Foreign and indian education Essay

Any whiz who has studied in Indian schools and colleges provide vouch for the particular that Indian Education carcass churn out more than than engineers, doctors and MBAs in equation to each rough otherwise country in the world. This has partly got to do with the mentality of Indian pargonnts who believe that bushel excogitation of educating their kids is to come a well paying line of work. In India, pargonnts save a huge bow on the major life decisions of their children including which school or college they attend, what branch of bringing up their kids pursue and even which job they take up later in life. No doubt this creates a huge pool of enlightened individuals scarcely the quality leaves a lot to be desired.Indian Education SystemFrom a very(prenominal) young age it is ingrained in the minds of Indian children that the purpose of fosterage is to find a sufficient job. This creates an impression on the minds of these children which is difficult to correct at a later stage. Individual aptitude towards any(prenominal) vocation, interests in any particular stream is sacrificed in the pursuit of a degree, which chip ins them job ready. The consequences towards this cost of preparation is that in the short term in that respect is a boom in the number of professionals however in the long term beas same(p) researches, arts and each(prenominal)ied aras take a beating. This is dangerous for a ontogenesis economy like India. This creates a rat race to cast down admission in reputed program lineal institutes secure from school level putting pressure on youngsters to perform in force fields which might non unavoidably appeal to them resulting in disappointment when unable to perform. impertinent Education SystemForeign education, on the reverse gear in general and western education in particular foc c anys more on individual interests, acquirement abilities and aptitude towards any vocations. The social brass also supports indi vidual education to a immense evanesce unlike India, the purpose of foreign education system is not to land a job to make a living but holistic development of individuals. The performance measurement and grading system in foreign countries encourages blooming of individuals talents in diverse fields and does not restrict children to mere classroom studies. This attack is more practical and suited to overall individual development. Hence the focus of foreign education system is creating individuals with a unsubtle outlook towards all aspects and does not narrow the purpose of education just for the purpose of getting a job.Both approaches take hold their pros and cons while education system might create more professionals it definitely needs to broaden its scope and focus more on grooming tomorrows citizens who stinker lead the country in all beas. Foreign education system is more spare in its attitude which can sometime proof counterproductive especially when children from different educational backgrounds cognise it for the first time. If we are to compare both education systems, both bind their own merits however looking for at the broader picture all we can say is it is up to the individual. As Mark Twain, at adept time said, take ont let schooling interfere with your childs educationEducation is the key institution for the success of any country and the rectifyment of any individual. However, given the culture and mindset of different races, there is a different approach towards education. And to be more precise, there is a contrast between the approach towards education in the western countries and in India. Apparently, the fundamental is that there is a chalk and cheese fight in the objective of education in both sides.Apparently, the foreign students treat education more like a learning process. On the other hand, they choose the line they are interested in and go only for that category and line of career. In this process, they tend to wait for the right kind of job and mountt really divvy up time as a hindrance. On the other hand, the objective of education in India has more to do with a fat salaried job, overseas chances, pause marriage prospects, post in society etc.However, analysts on both sides say there is a lot of difference in terms of competition, aptitude and the job markets in both hemispheres. While things are rather relaxed owe to the lesser population, more streamlined procedure and lack of unfair style, things are quite different when it comes to India. As much(prenominal), money becomes the root cause since closely of the steeper end courses are taken on check loan. So, it is more about circumstances than choices for many students.However, to those who manage to get admission in the foreign schools, once adaptability is achieved, the path is set and clear. Also, given the infrastructure, access to various resources and other facilities, the quality tends to be higher in terms of conduc ive learning. Though changes are macrocosm noticed in India with top league B-Schools center on quality and better infrastructure, there is still that gap between foreign schools and Indian educational institutions. With globalisation happening rapidly and economies getting tighter in developed countries, changes are being noticed so let us see how things take shape.1)The big difference is whatever discarded theories we learn in india those theories are not lernt by foreign good deal 2)Most part of their education is covered under practicals advantageously to be practical foreign education is a bit better than Indian education but in a certain aspect.Let me just put some flashlight on few areas why Indians prefer foreign educationJobs This is the main reason why pile go abroad and spend millions of money on it. Many students are directly placed in foreign companies and so they prefer foreign education.Other reasons why it is better is that there is a better understanding and re lationship between teachers and students. Schools have an open environment of teaching and has got no shyness on topics such as sex. In India no topic such as sex is taught in any school.Students are encouraged to work on their own projects on acquisition and incentives are provided to them. Here thers no such sort of a thing. You are on your own.solely recently there has been a boom in our Indian education as we are developing and bonny better than other nations.Due to recession many students are now preferring to stay in India now and pursue their course here as in abroad IT sector is the major head of earnings in companies. Foreign companies are suffering a blow down thereby leading to decline in jobs.If we consider the management area, then yeah we may say that foreign is better in providing management degrees than India. We have here only 10-15 reputed colleges which offer good MBA degree. Of these 10-15 the competition is killing and you really need to tie your boots if you wanna get into them.Regarding Science scenario we are in with other nations.Consider for example the CERN EXPERIMENT. This experiment consisted of colliding two protons. The experiment was triple-crown which was feared by many people as it would lead to collapse of earth innovationet. The CERN association consisted of more than two hundred Indian scientists.I totally agree with Lenins verbalisement about what he said on professional honor of degree. If we do Phd. or master key degree from abroad it has a greater value than the one wear offe from India.Rest I would say that its totally the mindset of the person who wishes to pursue his education either from India or foreign. Mostly students who pursue from abroad have a greater bank offset and so utilize money by showing their standards. Other reasons are that often students of rich families who are not able to get into top Indian colleges in engineering and mbbs head for abroad. Believe me its true. It happens in medical fie ld. Many students pursue their MBBS from abroad due to non selection in Indian colleges.The basic and roughly important difference between the two educational systems is the centering on math that is given in India (and Europe, I have been told) at the elementary and high school level itself. Mathematics, in my humble opinion, teaches students analytic and rational thinking it lays the establishation of independent and lateral thinking. Indian schools start teaching maths, like genesis tables, at the elementary level itself. It is given a lot of importance and is a must for students who plan to do science related study in college.On the other hand, high school in America is so flexible that a lot of students who end up majoring in sciences in college do not take advanced maths and calculus in high school. In general, I found that at the end of their 1st year of university, math majors in the US are equivalent to high school graduates in India in terms of math study. This emph asis on maths in high schools and engineering programs is also the reason why India produces so many good software engineers. The analytical thinking taught by mathematics is exactly what is required for software development.The flexibility of the American education system is its greatest strength and also its greatest weakness. Students can choose among a host of classes and courses in high school and college. This means they can change their major (i.e. field of study) midway through college. This ordinarily means that students in the US receive more exposure to a variety of subjects and hence, are more conscious(predicate) of their career options and opportunities. However, the downside is that they can avoid taking courses which are hard in their major. The computing device science students in my department in the US are often criticized for avoiding a lot of important computer science courses by taking easier courses from other departments that fulfill their degree requireme nts.On digging deeper into the root of the problem, I established that the general problem with the American education (high school and college) system is that it is designed so as not to reduce/hurt the self-esteem of any kid in class. So, the system is designed in such a way that nearly everyone can pass the high-school level. This leads to lowering the standards at the high school, which in acetify leads to lowering the standards for college entrance in addition and subsequent college programs. So, college students in, say, computer science, are learning much less and at a much slower pace than the students in computer science programs in India and EuropeThis is one of the main reasons why most of the graduate students in computer science in the US are foriegn students American students are just not able to compete with the quality of foriegn student applicants. College education is becoming common place, with a large proportion of high school graduates opting for it. Universi ties are under pressure from state governments to take in more students, that is, in turn, leading to reduced quality and lower standards (quality*quantity=constant).Universities are just not able to cope with the quick increases and the corresponding lack of good strength. The situation is not improving either People kick and scream about the fact that immigrants are taking over the country and the hi-tech jobs, but very few people are examining the reasons why this is happening. Most people are fiercely defensive about the country and refuse to believe that anything can be pervert with the countrys education system since they are the technology leaders. However, nobody realizes or admits that this, to a great extent, is due to brain inflow of immigrants from Asia (India included) and Europe.However, the flip side of the coin is that the Indian education and social systems are very hard on kids and completely ignore their feelings, opinions and ambitions. Kids are pushed to stud y from the age of 3 and non-performers are treated as dolts and ostracized by parents and society. The preferred choice of learning and teaching is memorizing facts. These facts do help in the long run the multiplication tables we learned in elementary school keep us forwards of our American peers who need a calculator to find out what 6 times 7 is However, the memorisation approach to study does not allow and teach kids to think independently. The American school system lays stress on individual ability development and encourages kids to express themselves and their opinions from an early age. As a result, most Americans are way better at getting their point across as compared to people from other countries.However, again, the downside of this is that students in the US who are more out-spoken do well in class and outside class too only because they are more effective speakers. In the Indian system, individuals are not asked to stand up infront of the whole class and recite somet hing. Instead, the whole class reads books out aloud together in unison. This allows more timid students to participate and overcome their fear of public speaking (since they are actually speaking with a group). Individual speaking is only done with the teacher one-on-one during oral examinations, where students are asked questions on the subject matter. Both systems work, however, in the Indian system, just because you cant speak well, does not mean you dont do well in class.But students in the US build more self-confidence and are much better at public speaking. Indian students on the other hand find it hard to learn to speak up or express their opinions (I know those are really broad generalizations). Classroom discussion and asking questions to the professors is encouraged. However, in India, professors expect you to treat them like God and often use their almost dictorial powers against students who upset them in some way.On a different note, another observation I made, while I was a teaching assistant (TA) for a senior level (3rd-4th year) class of computer science undergraduates, is that their focus in class and attitude towards the course was completely exam-oriented (ofcourse, there were some extremely motivated and intelligent students too). They constantly wanted to know if what was being discussed would be on the quiz or the final. Almost no one in the class was attempting to understand concepts. They wanted to learn to solve all the kinds of problems that may appear in the quiz.One may argue that this is a natural thing for students to want. But the fact of the matter is that the American college education system is industry-oriented and hence, is structured so that it produces people who can do a certain type of job efficiently. So it is like a custom-design factory which produces engineers/workers who can do one or two jobs very well but require massive retraining if they have to do something new. In contrast, the education in India (and Euro pe) is more towards teaching the basic concepts and a broader mass of information.The products of this education system, are therefore capable of taking up several different types of jobs and are not masters of any single job. To do any single job well, they have to go through some amount of training at work. Another realization that the other TA and myself made was that the students wanted to be spoon-fed and told exactly what they needed to do, in order to do well in the course.This mentality of always being told to read something, do some assignment and essentially, being given goal-oriented tasks to perform, works great when students are being trained to work in the industry. And this is an admirable goal America is built on the strength of these students who can perform what they have been told to do. However, in the long run, these people are not able to adapt chop-chop to changes in the industry. And they are definitely not prepared to go to graduate school (for a masters o r a Phd).Graduate school is very different from undergraduate school. There is no single book being followed the reading and writing assignments require paper chases and are ambiguously defined. Also, most courses do not have regular evaluations such as quizes etc. but rely on a final project or term paper this makes it very hard for one to know how much effort one needs to put into the course. One has to come out of the spoonfeed me sense modality and learn to think independently.This lack of spoonfeeding in graduate school also means that one has to be motivated by themselves especially in PhD programs. The amount that you get out of your masters or PhD depends on the amount of work you put in (more work also means winged graduation). There is no one motivating you to work harder or checking on your progress regularly. (By the way, my arguments in the outstrips versus PhD debate are available here) Something I would like to stress is that the situation I have described is for public universities in the US.Private liberal arts universities provide much better personalize attention to students besides a broader education. Also, non-science programs are stronger in general in the US due to the fact that they follow regular quarter or semester systems in India, non-science programs usually have year long schedules with exams at the end of the year, whereas in the US, these programs have regular quizes and exams like all other science programs. On the other hand, most university students in India waste their whole year doing nothing attendence requirements are very low and usually can be bypassed.Overall, I feel that the high school system in the US leaves students at a disadvantage when compared to their peers in India, Europe and perhaps the rest of Asia too. Some Americans cannot point out all the states in the United States on a map, let alone know anything about India (read the humorous commonly asked questions about India or watch Jay Lenos streetwa lk).This leads me to conclude that an Indian education is overall better atleast till the undergraduate degree (for engineering). However, graduate programs in the US are probably far in the lead of most other countries due to the critical mass they have and the fact that they attract the best students and faculty from all over the world.